
Anderson, D.R.,
Holmes, W.W.,
Lee, R.B.,
Hurst, C.G.,
Maliner, B.I.,
Dalal, S.J.,
Estep, S.,
Newmark, J.,
Tucker, S.,
McGarry, M.,
Smith, W.J.
Although best known as a blistering agent, sulfur mustard (HD) can also cause significant neutropenia in exposed individuals, leaving them susceptible to infection. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and, more recently, pegylated G-CSF (peg-G-CSF) are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as hematopoietic growth factors used clinically to treat chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of recombinant human G-CSF (Neupogen®, Amgen, Inc.) and peg-G-CSF (Neulasta®) in reducing or eliminating HD-induced neutropenia in a non-human primate (NHP) model. A preliminary dose ranging study (3 NHPs each at 0.75, 1.0 or 1.5 mg/kg HD, iv) determined the 1.0 mg/kg, iv, dose to optimally induce neutropenia in African green monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops). Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1000 cells/ul. These animals were challenged with 1.0 mg/kg, iv, of HD, and at 1, 3, 5 or 7 days postexposure G-CSF therapy was initiated (10 ug/kg, sc, once/day). Control groups (HD only and G-CSF only) were also included. G-CSF administration continued until the ANC stabilized at or above baseline. Pegylated-G-CSF (peg-G-CSF; 300 ug/kg, sc, single treatment) was similarly tested with treatment given at 3 days postexposure. Neutrophil counts were monitored for 30 days after the initiation of CSF therapy. Untreated HD-exposed NHPs did not recover from neutropenia until day 28 postexposure, whereas the G-CSF- or peg-G-CSF-treated NHPs recovered 8 to 19 days postexposure. These results indicate that G-CSF or peg-C-CSF may provide FDA-approved drugs that will reduce the duration of HD-induced neutropenia. G-CSF or peg-G-CSF treatment could ultimately decrease the duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with secondary infections and reduce the length of patient hospitalization.
Smith, W.J.
Proceedings of the medical defense bioscience review, 2004
199-1
199-1